AB1600 TIME TO PUBLICATION AND TIME-LAG PUBLICATION BIAS FOR RANDOMIZED TRIALS ON CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES

نویسندگان

چکیده

Background Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are systemic autoimmune diseases, some of which rare, characterized by a dysregulated immune response and heterogeneous clinical picture. Similarly to nonpublication, long time from completion publication randomized controlled trials (RCTs) results can indirectly harm patients allowing inefficacious or dangerous intervention being prescribed [1] , delaying the prescription useful treatment. We have recently shown that one-third CTDs-RCTs registered after 2000 never reached [2] but we did not estimate extent time-lag bias, neither analyzed factors associated with delayed publication. Objectives To assess on connective (CTDs), investigate with, explore influence significance study (time-lag bias). Methods included interventional, phase 2/3, 3 4 RCTs CTDs in Clinicaltrials.gov 2016, whose had been published peer-review journal less than 5 years their completion. Two reviewers selected studies according pre-specified criteria. Main trial features including primary outcome were collected. Time was earliest online date. Multivariable linear regression used identify association between results, adjusted for variables previously impact this outcome, e.g. funder, size trial, international status, year factor journal. Results 62 studies, mostly (62%) pharmacologic treatments (94%), recruiting lupus (55%) sclerosis (23%), planning enroll median 131 [IQR 61-288] patients. Twenty-two (35%) reported at least statistically significant outcome. Median 28 months 17-36], more half (n = 34, 55%) 2 (see Table 1). In multivariable analysis, progressively improved over (faster recent years, begin 1.3 [0.3, 2.4] shorter every year), influenced journal, number countries Figure Conclusion A high proportion is beyond find evidence time. References Awasthi S, Peto R, Read Richards SM, Pande V, Bundy D, DEVTA (Deworming Enhanced Vitamin A) team. Population deworming 6 albendazole 1 million pre-school children North India: DEVTA, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet . 2013;381(9876):1478-1486. Brigante A, Russo B, Mongin Lauper K, Allali Courvoisier DS, Iudici M. Extent reasons discontinuation nonpublication interventional diseases: an observational study. Arthritis Care & Research Published January 22, 2022. 1. Factors multivariate analysis. Factor Coefficient (95% CI) P value (Intercept) 41.3 (30.1; 52.4) <0.001 Positive (reference no) -1.5 (-8.6; 5.7) 0.69 Industry-funded (ref industry funded) -0.2 (-9.5; 9.1) 0.97 International international) 3.3 (-8.0; 14.5) 0.57 Impact 0.1 (-0.1; 0.3) 0.47 Number (per 100 patients) -1.2 (-2.6; 0.2) 0.09 Completion (counting 2000) -1.3 (-2.3; -0.3) 0.01 evolution considered present Area points proportional enrolment size. Acknowledgements: NIL. Disclosure Interests None Declared.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cross-sectional study of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials: assessment of time to publication and publication history

OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials that completed in 2010 and are published as manuscripts in the peer-reviewed literature, and to assess the manuscript development history. DESIGN Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. SETTING Clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov that completed in 2010 for approved, Pfizer prescription products in patient...

متن کامل

Publication policy or publication bias?

Although ‘‘a large number of studies have appeared in the literature that report associations of low penetrance genetic variants with disease,’’ as suggested in the recent CEBP editorial (1), hardly any of these reports have been translated into solid results by replication studies, at least for the common cancers. To some extent this is inevitable, as false-positive associations are an inheren...

متن کامل

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias.

We offer a solution to this problem that lies at the disposal of journal editors. Preliminary editorial decisions could be based solely on the peer review of the introduction and methods sections of submitted papers. These two sections deal with the key issues on which editorial decisions would ideally be based: the importance of the research question and the potential for the study design and ...

متن کامل

Software for Publication Bias

KEY POINTS • Various procedures for addressing publication bias are discussed elsewhere in this volume. The goal of this chapter is to show how these different procedures fit into an overall strategy for addressing bias, and to discuss computer programs that can be used to implement this strategy. • To address publication bias the researcher should proceed through a logical sequence of analyses...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1468-2060', '0003-4967']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.2207